# Perguntas Essenciais para Entrevista de DevOps: Guia Completo 2026 > Prepare-se para entrevistas de DevOps com as perguntas mais cobradas sobre CI/CD, Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform e práticas de SRE. Respostas detalhadas inclusas. - Published: 2026-01-23 - Updated: 2026-04-10 - Author: SharpSkill - Tags: devops, interview, ci cd, kubernetes, infrastructure - Reading time: 15 min --- Entrevistas de DevOps avaliam uma combinação singular de habilidades em desenvolvimento, operações e cultura de automação. Este guia reúne as perguntas mais frequentes, organizadas por domínio, com respostas estruturadas que demonstram domínio profundo dos conceitos. > **Dica de preparação** > > Além do conhecimento técnico, os recrutadores avaliam a capacidade de explicar conceitos complexos de forma simples e compartilhar experiências concretas de resolução de problemas. ## Fundamentos e Cultura DevOps As perguntas iniciais geralmente avaliam a compreensão geral da filosofia DevOps. **Q1: O que é DevOps e quais problemas essa abordagem resolve?** DevOps representa uma cultura e um conjunto de práticas que unificam o desenvolvimento de software (Dev) e as operações de TI (Ops). Essa abordagem tem como objetivo encurtar o ciclo de desenvolvimento mantendo alta qualidade. ```yaml # devops-principles.yaml # The pillars of DevOps culture principles: collaboration: description: "Breaking silos between teams" practices: - "Shared responsibility for production code" - "Continuous communication via ChatOps" - "Blameless post-mortems" automation: description: "Automate repetitive tasks" practices: - "Infrastructure as Code (IaC)" - "CI/CD pipelines" - "Automated testing at all levels" measurement: description: "Measure to improve" metrics: - "Deployment frequency" - "Lead time for changes" - "Mean time to recovery (MTTR)" - "Change failure rate" sharing: description: "Share knowledge" practices: - "Documentation as Code" - "Automated runbooks" - "Regular knowledge sharing sessions" ``` Os problemas resolvidos incluem deploys lentos e arriscados, falta de visibilidade entre equipes e inconsistência entre ambientes. **Q2: Qual é a diferença entre CI, CD (Continuous Delivery) e CD (Continuous Deployment)?** Esses três conceitos formam uma progressão na automação do ciclo de entrega. ```bash # ci-cd-pipeline-stages.sh # Illustration of CI/CD stages # ============================================ # CI (Continuous Integration) # ============================================ # Goal: Frequently integrate code into a shared repository # Automation: Build + Tests echo "CI: Code commit → Build → Unit Tests → Integration Tests" # ============================================ # CD (Continuous Delivery) # ============================================ # Goal: Code always deployable to production # Automation: CI + Staging deployment + Manual approval echo "CD Delivery: CI → Deploy Staging → Manual Approval → Deploy Prod" # ============================================ # CD (Continuous Deployment) # ============================================ # Goal: Automatic deployment to production # Automation: Entire pipeline without human intervention echo "CD Deployment: CI → Deploy Staging → Auto Tests → Auto Deploy Prod" ``` A distinção central está no nível de automação: Continuous Delivery exige validação manual antes da produção, enquanto Continuous Deployment automatiza completamente o processo. ## CI/CD e Pipelines As perguntas sobre CI/CD testam a capacidade de projetar e otimizar pipelines de entrega. **Q3: Como estruturar um pipeline de CI/CD robusto?** Um pipeline bem projetado segue etapas progressivas com pontos de verificação em cada nível. ```yaml # .gitlab-ci.yml # Complete CI/CD pipeline with parallel and sequential stages stages: - validate - build - test - security - deploy-staging - integration-tests - deploy-production variables: DOCKER_IMAGE: $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA # ============================================ # Stage 1: Fast validation (< 2 min) # ============================================ lint: stage: validate script: - npm run lint - npm run type-check # Run on every commit rules: - if: $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == "merge_request_event" - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH # ============================================ # Stage 2: Application build # ============================================ build: stage: build script: - docker build -t $DOCKER_IMAGE . - docker push $DOCKER_IMAGE # Cache Docker layers to speed up builds cache: key: docker-$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG paths: - .docker-cache/ # ============================================ # Stage 3: Parallel tests # ============================================ unit-tests: stage: test script: - npm run test:unit -- --coverage coverage: '/Lines\s*:\s*(\d+\.?\d*)%/' artifacts: reports: coverage_report: coverage_format: cobertura path: coverage/cobertura-coverage.xml integration-tests: stage: test services: - postgres:16-alpine - redis:7-alpine script: - npm run test:integration # Parallelization with unit tests parallel: 3 # ============================================ # Stage 4: Security analysis # ============================================ sast: stage: security script: - trivy image --exit-code 1 --severity HIGH,CRITICAL $DOCKER_IMAGE allow_failure: false dependency-scan: stage: security script: - npm audit --audit-level=high allow_failure: true # Alert without blocking # ============================================ # Stage 5: Staging deployment # ============================================ deploy-staging: stage: deploy-staging script: - kubectl set image deployment/app app=$DOCKER_IMAGE -n staging - kubectl rollout status deployment/app -n staging --timeout=300s environment: name: staging url: https://staging.example.com only: - develop # ============================================ # Stage 6: E2E tests on staging # ============================================ e2e-tests: stage: integration-tests script: - npm run test:e2e -- --base-url=https://staging.example.com artifacts: when: on_failure paths: - cypress/screenshots/ - cypress/videos/ only: - develop # ============================================ # Stage 7: Production deployment # ============================================ deploy-production: stage: deploy-production script: - kubectl set image deployment/app app=$DOCKER_IMAGE -n production - kubectl rollout status deployment/app -n production --timeout=300s environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com # Manual deployment with protection when: manual only: - main ``` Este pipeline ilustra as boas práticas: etapas paralelas para velocidade, artefatos para rastreabilidade e ambientes protegidos para produção. **Q4: Como gerenciar segredos em um pipeline de CI/CD?** O gerenciamento de segredos requer uma abordagem em múltiplas camadas combinando criptografia, rotação e o princípio do menor privilégio. ```yaml # kubernetes-secrets-management.yaml # Approach 1: External Secrets Operator with HashiCorp Vault apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1 kind: ExternalSecret metadata: name: app-secrets namespace: production spec: refreshInterval: 1h # Automatic rotation secretStoreRef: name: vault-backend kind: ClusterSecretStore target: name: app-secrets creationPolicy: Owner data: # Reference to secret in Vault - secretKey: DATABASE_PASSWORD remoteRef: key: secret/data/production/database property: password - secretKey: API_KEY remoteRef: key: secret/data/production/api property: key --- # SecretStore configuration apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1 kind: ClusterSecretStore metadata: name: vault-backend spec: provider: vault: server: "https://vault.example.com" path: "secret" version: "v2" auth: kubernetes: mountPath: "kubernetes" role: "external-secrets" # Dedicated ServiceAccount with minimal permissions serviceAccountRef: name: external-secrets-sa ``` Práticas recomendadas: nunca armazenar segredos em texto simples no código, utilizar gerenciadores dedicados (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) e habilitar rotação automática. > **Antipadrão** > > Evite variáveis de ambiente de CI/CD visíveis nos logs. Sempre mascare segredos com os recursos nativos da plataforma de CI (variáveis mascaradas). ## Kubernetes e Orquestração As perguntas sobre Kubernetes avaliam a compreensão dos conceitos de orquestração e a capacidade de resolver problemas concretos. **Q5: Explique a arquitetura do Kubernetes e o papel de cada componente.** O Kubernetes segue uma arquitetura master-node com componentes de responsabilidades distintas. ```yaml # kubernetes-architecture.yaml # Control Plane components (Master) control_plane: api_server: role: "Entry point for all API requests" responsibilities: - "Validation and configuration of API objects" - "Authentication and authorization" - "REST interface for kubectl and other clients" etcd: role: "Distributed key-value database" responsibilities: - "Cluster state storage" - "Source of truth for configuration" - "Consensus via Raft algorithm" scheduler: role: "Assigning Pods to nodes" responsibilities: - "Evaluating constraints (resources, affinity)" - "Selecting the optimal node" - "Respecting PodDisruptionBudgets" controller_manager: role: "Control loops for desired state" controllers: - "ReplicaSet Controller" - "Deployment Controller" - "Service Controller" - "Node Controller" # Worker Node components worker_nodes: kubelet: role: "Agent on each node" responsibilities: - "Communication with Control Plane" - "Pod lifecycle management" - "Node status reporting" kube_proxy: role: "Network proxy on each node" responsibilities: - "iptables/IPVS rules for Services" - "Intra-cluster load balancing" container_runtime: role: "Container execution" options: - "containerd (recommended)" - "CRI-O" ``` Essa arquitetura viabiliza alta disponibilidade: o Control Plane pode ser replicado e as cargas de trabalho são distribuídas entre os Worker Nodes. **Q6: Como depurar um Pod que não inicia?** A depuração no Kubernetes segue uma abordagem metódica analisando diferentes camadas. ```bash # kubernetes-debugging.sh # Workflow for debugging a failing Pod # Step 1: Check Pod status kubectl get pod my-app-pod -o wide # STATUS: CrashLoopBackOff, ImagePullBackOff, Pending, etc. # Step 2: Pod details and events kubectl describe pod my-app-pod # Important sections: # - Conditions (PodScheduled, Initialized, Ready) # - Events (scheduling, pull errors, etc.) # Step 3: Container logs kubectl logs my-app-pod --previous # Previous crash logs kubectl logs my-app-pod -c init-container # Init container logs # Step 4: Interactive execution for debugging kubectl exec -it my-app-pod -- sh # Check: env vars, mounted files, network # Step 5: Check available resources kubectl describe node # Sections: Allocatable, Allocated resources # Step 6: Debug with ephemeral Pod (K8s 1.25+) kubectl debug my-app-pod -it --image=busybox --share-processes ``` As causas mais comuns incluem: recursos insuficientes, imagem não encontrada, segredos ausentes ou probes mal configuradas. ```yaml # pod-debugging-checklist.yaml # Debugging checklist by status debugging_by_status: Pending: causes: - "Insufficient resources on nodes" - "PersistentVolumeClaim not bound" - "Affinity/Taints not satisfied" commands: - "kubectl describe pod | grep -A 20 Events" - "kubectl get pvc" - "kubectl describe nodes | grep -A 5 Allocated" ImagePullBackOff: causes: - "Non-existent image or incorrect tag" - "Private registry without imagePullSecrets" - "Docker Hub rate limiting" commands: - "kubectl get events --field-selector reason=Failed" - "kubectl get secret -o yaml" CrashLoopBackOff: causes: - "Application error at startup" - "Missing configuration (env vars, configmaps)" - "Liveness probe too aggressive" commands: - "kubectl logs --previous" - "kubectl describe pod | grep -A 10 Liveness" OOMKilled: causes: - "Memory limit too low" - "Memory leak in application" commands: - "kubectl describe pod | grep -A 5 Last State" - "kubectl top pod " ``` ## Infraestrutura como Código As perguntas sobre IaC avaliam o domínio de ferramentas de provisionamento e boas práticas. **Q7: Terraform vs Ansible: quando usar cada ferramenta?** Essas ferramentas têm filosofias e casos de uso distintos. ```hcl # terraform-example.tf # Terraform: Infrastructure provisioning (declarative) # Ideal for: cloud resources, networking, infrastructure state terraform { required_providers { aws = { source = "hashicorp/aws" version = "~> 5.0" } } # Remote state for collaboration backend "s3" { bucket = "terraform-state-prod" key = "infrastructure/terraform.tfstate" region = "eu-west-1" dynamodb_table = "terraform-locks" encrypt = true } } # Declarative resource: Terraform manages the lifecycle resource "aws_eks_cluster" "main" { name = "production-cluster" role_arn = aws_iam_role.eks_cluster.arn version = "1.29" vpc_config { subnet_ids = module.vpc.private_subnets endpoint_private_access = true endpoint_public_access = false } # Implicit dependencies managed by Terraform depends_on = [ aws_iam_role_policy_attachment.eks_cluster_policy ] } # Reusable modules for standardization module "vpc" { source = "terraform-aws-modules/vpc/aws" version = "5.0.0" name = "production-vpc" cidr = "10.0.0.0/16" azs = ["eu-west-1a", "eu-west-1b", "eu-west-1c"] private_subnets = ["10.0.1.0/24", "10.0.2.0/24", "10.0.3.0/24"] public_subnets = ["10.0.101.0/24", "10.0.102.0/24", "10.0.103.0/24"] enable_nat_gateway = true single_nat_gateway = false # HA: one NAT per AZ } ``` ```yaml # ansible-example.yml # Ansible: Configuration management (procedural/declarative) # Ideal for: OS configuration, app deployment, orchestration --- - name: Configure application servers hosts: app_servers become: yes vars: app_version: "2.5.0" tasks: # System package management - name: Install required packages ansible.builtin.apt: name: - nginx - python3-pip - supervisor state: present update_cache: yes # Configuration via Jinja2 templates - name: Deploy nginx configuration ansible.builtin.template: src: templates/nginx.conf.j2 dest: /etc/nginx/sites-available/app owner: root group: root mode: '0644' notify: Reload nginx # Application deployment - name: Deploy application ansible.builtin.git: repo: "https://github.com/org/app.git" dest: /opt/app version: "v{{ app_version }}" notify: Restart application handlers: - name: Reload nginx ansible.builtin.service: name: nginx state: reloaded - name: Restart application ansible.builtin.supervisorctl: name: app state: restarted ``` Em síntese: Terraform para infraestrutura (o que existe), Ansible para configuração (como está configurado). As duas ferramentas são frequentemente combinadas em um fluxo completo. **Q8: Como estruturar um projeto Terraform para uma organização de grande porte?** Uma estrutura modular com separação por ambiente facilita a manutenção e a colaboração. ```bash # terraform-project-structure # Recommended structure for enterprise projects terraform-infrastructure/ ├── modules/ # Reusable modules │ ├── networking/ │ │ ├── main.tf │ │ ├── variables.tf │ │ ├── outputs.tf │ │ └── README.md │ ├── kubernetes/ │ │ ├── main.tf │ │ ├── variables.tf │ │ └── outputs.tf │ └── database/ │ ├── main.tf │ ├── variables.tf │ └── outputs.tf │ ├── environments/ # Per-environment configuration │ ├── dev/ │ │ ├── main.tf # Calls modules │ │ ├── variables.tf │ │ ├── terraform.tfvars # Dev values │ │ └── backend.tf # Dev state │ ├── staging/ │ │ ├── main.tf │ │ ├── terraform.tfvars │ │ └── backend.tf │ └── production/ │ ├── main.tf │ ├── terraform.tfvars │ └── backend.tf │ ├── shared/ # Shared resources │ ├── iam/ │ └── dns/ │ └── .github/ └── workflows/ └── terraform.yml # CI/CD pipeline ``` ```hcl # environments/production/main.tf # Example of module usage module "networking" { source = "../../modules/networking" environment = "production" vpc_cidr = var.vpc_cidr azs = var.availability_zones enable_flow_logs = true } module "kubernetes" { source = "../../modules/kubernetes" environment = "production" cluster_name = "prod-cluster" vpc_id = module.networking.vpc_id subnet_ids = module.networking.private_subnet_ids node_groups = var.node_groups # Production: HA configuration cluster_version = "1.29" enable_cluster_autoscaler = true } module "database" { source = "../../modules/database" environment = "production" vpc_id = module.networking.vpc_id subnet_ids = module.networking.database_subnet_ids instance_class = "db.r6g.xlarge" multi_az = true # HA in production backup_retention = 30 } ``` Essa estrutura possibilita: versionamento de módulos, revisão de mudanças por ambiente e reaproveitamento de código. ## Monitoramento e Observabilidade As perguntas sobre monitoramento avaliam a capacidade de projetar sistemas observáveis. **Q9: Quais são os três pilares da observabilidade?** A observabilidade se apoia em três tipos de dados complementares que ajudam a entender o estado interno de um sistema. ```yaml # observability-pillars.yaml # The three pillars of observability pillars: metrics: description: "Numeric data aggregated over time" characteristics: - "Low cardinality" - "Efficient storage" - "Ideal for alerting" examples: - "request_count (counter)" - "response_time_seconds (histogram)" - "active_connections (gauge)" tools: - "Prometheus" - "Datadog" - "CloudWatch" use_cases: - "Real-time dashboards" - "Threshold alerts" - "Capacity planning" logs: description: "Timestamped text events" characteristics: - "High cardinality" - "Detailed context" - "Large storage" examples: - "Application errors" - "Audit events" - "Debug information" tools: - "Loki" - "Elasticsearch" - "CloudWatch Logs" use_cases: - "Debugging" - "Audit compliance" - "Root cause analysis" traces: description: "Request tracking across services" characteristics: - "End-to-end view" - "Context propagation" - "Bottleneck identification" examples: - "Distributed transaction" - "Service dependencies" - "Latency breakdown" tools: - "Jaeger" - "Tempo" - "AWS X-Ray" use_cases: - "Performance optimization" - "Service dependencies" - "Error propagation" ``` **Q10: Como configurar alertas eficazes?** Alertas bem projetados reduzem a fadiga e permitem resposta rápida a incidentes. ```yaml # prometheus-alerting-rules.yaml # Prometheus alerting rules with best practices groups: - name: application-alerts rules: # Alert on symptom, not cause - alert: HighErrorRate # Error rate > 1% over 5 minutes expr: | sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) > 0.01 for: 5m # Avoid false positives labels: severity: critical team: backend annotations: summary: "High error rate detected" description: | Error rate is {{ $value | humanizePercentage }} for the last 5 minutes. runbook_url: "https://wiki.example.com/runbooks/high-error-rate" # Proactive alert on saturation - alert: DiskSpaceRunningLow expr: | (node_filesystem_avail_bytes / node_filesystem_size_bytes) * 100 < 20 for: 15m labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: "Disk space below 20%" description: | Node {{ $labels.instance }} has only {{ $value | humanize }}% disk space remaining. # SLO-based alerting - alert: SLOBudgetBurnRate # Error budget consumed too quickly expr: | ( sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[1h])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total[1h])) ) > (1 - 0.999) * 14.4 for: 5m labels: severity: critical annotations: summary: "SLO budget burning too fast" description: | At current error rate, monthly SLO budget will be exhausted in less than 2 days. ``` ```yaml # alertmanager-config.yaml # AlertManager configuration with intelligent routing global: resolve_timeout: 5m route: receiver: default group_by: [alertname, cluster, service] group_wait: 30s # Wait to group alerts group_interval: 5m # Interval between grouped notifications repeat_interval: 4h # Re-alert if not resolved routes: # Critical alerts: immediate notification - match: severity: critical receiver: pagerduty-critical continue: true # Also notify Slack # Alerts by team - match: team: backend receiver: slack-backend - match: team: infrastructure receiver: slack-infra receivers: - name: pagerduty-critical pagerduty_configs: - service_key: severity: critical - name: slack-backend slack_configs: - channel: '#alerts-backend' send_resolved: true title: '{{ .Status | toUpper }}: {{ .CommonAnnotations.summary }}' text: '{{ .CommonAnnotations.description }}' ``` Princípios fundamentais: alertar sobre sintomas (impacto para o usuário) e não sobre causas, incluir runbooks e ajustar os limiares de acordo com os SLOs. ## Segurança e Conformidade As perguntas sobre segurança avaliam a compreensão dos riscos e das contramedidas. **Q11: Como proteger um cluster Kubernetes?** A segurança no Kubernetes abrange múltiplas camadas: rede, autenticação, cargas de trabalho e dados. ```yaml # kubernetes-security-policies.yaml # NetworkPolicy: network isolation between namespaces apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: NetworkPolicy metadata: name: default-deny-all namespace: production spec: # Applied to all pods in namespace podSelector: {} policyTypes: - Ingress - Egress # No traffic allowed by default ingress: [] egress: [] --- # Allow only necessary traffic apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: NetworkPolicy metadata: name: api-network-policy namespace: production spec: podSelector: matchLabels: app: api policyTypes: - Ingress - Egress ingress: # Accept only from ingress controller - from: - namespaceSelector: matchLabels: name: ingress-nginx ports: - protocol: TCP port: 8080 egress: # Allow to database - to: - podSelector: matchLabels: app: postgres ports: - protocol: TCP port: 5432 # Allow DNS - to: - namespaceSelector: {} podSelector: matchLabels: k8s-app: kube-dns ports: - protocol: UDP port: 53 ``` ```yaml # pod-security-standards.yaml # PodSecurity: workload restrictions apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: production labels: # Enforce: blocks violations pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted # Warn: warns without blocking pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted # Audit: logs violations pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted --- # Pod compliant with "restricted" standards apiVersion: v1 kind: Pod metadata: name: secure-pod namespace: production spec: securityContext: runAsNonRoot: true runAsUser: 1000 fsGroup: 1000 seccompProfile: type: RuntimeDefault containers: - name: app image: myapp:latest securityContext: allowPrivilegeEscalation: false readOnlyRootFilesystem: true capabilities: drop: - ALL resources: limits: memory: "256Mi" cpu: "500m" requests: memory: "128Mi" cpu: "250m" volumeMounts: - name: tmp mountPath: /tmp volumes: - name: tmp emptyDir: {} ``` > **Defesa em profundidade** > > A segurança no Kubernetes combina múltiplas camadas: RBAC para autorização, NetworkPolicies para isolamento de rede, PodSecurity para restrições de carga de trabalho e criptografia de segredos em repouso. **Q12: O que é o princípio do menor privilégio e como aplicá-lo?** Este princípio determina que um usuário ou sistema deve ter apenas as permissões mínimas necessárias para executar sua tarefa. ```yaml # rbac-least-privilege.yaml # Kubernetes RBAC with minimal permissions # Role: permissions in a specific namespace apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 kind: Role metadata: namespace: production name: deployment-manager rules: # Pod reading (for monitoring) - apiGroups: [""] resources: ["pods", "pods/log"] verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"] # Deployment management only - apiGroups: ["apps"] resources: ["deployments"] verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "update", "patch"] # No create/delete on deployments # No access to secrets or sensitive configmaps --- # RoleBinding: Role <-> ServiceAccount association apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 kind: RoleBinding metadata: name: deployment-manager-binding namespace: production subjects: - kind: ServiceAccount name: ci-cd-deployer namespace: production roleRef: kind: Role name: deployment-manager apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io --- # Dedicated ServiceAccount for CI/CD apiVersion: v1 kind: ServiceAccount metadata: name: ci-cd-deployer namespace: production annotations: # Automatic token expiration kubernetes.io/enforce-mountable-secrets: "true" ``` Este princípio se aplica também ao AWS IAM, bancos de dados e acessos de rede. ## SRE e Confiabilidade As perguntas sobre SRE avaliam a compreensão das práticas de confiabilidade e gestão de incidentes. **Q13: O que é um SLO e como defini-lo?** Os Service Level Objectives (SLOs) quantificam a confiabilidade esperada de um serviço e orientam decisões de engenharia. ```yaml # slo-definitions.yaml # SLO definitions for an API service service: payment-api owner: payments-team slos: - name: availability description: "Service responds successfully to requests" sli: # SLI: measured metric type: availability good_events: "http_requests_total{status=~'2..'}" total_events: "http_requests_total" target: 99.9% # SLO: objective window: 30d # Measurement window # Error budget: 0.1% = 43.2 minutes/month error_budget: monthly_minutes: 43.2 - name: latency description: "Response time below threshold" sli: type: latency good_events: "http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le='0.3'}" total_events: "http_request_duration_seconds_count" target: 99% # 99% of requests < 300ms window: 30d - name: throughput description: "Ability to process transactions" sli: type: throughput query: "sum(rate(transactions_processed_total[5m]))" target: ">= 1000 TPS" # Actions based on error budget error_budget_policy: - condition: "remaining > 50%" actions: - "Feature development prioritized" - "Experimentation allowed" - condition: "remaining 20-50%" actions: - "Balance features and reliability" - "Increase testing coverage" - condition: "remaining < 20%" actions: - "Freeze non-critical deployments" - "Focus on reliability improvements" - condition: "exhausted" actions: - "Incident response mode" - "All hands on reliability" ``` Os SLOs permitem decisões objetivas: lançar uma nova funcionalidade ou reforçar a confiabilidade do serviço. **Q14: Como conduzir um post-mortem eficaz?** Um post-mortem sem atribuição de culpa promove o aprendizado e a prevenção de incidentes futuros. ```yaml # postmortem-template.yaml # Blameless post-mortem template incident: id: "INC-2026-0042" title: "Payment service unavailability" severity: SEV1 duration: "45 minutes" date: "2026-01-15" # Factual timeline timeline: - time: "14:32" event: "Alert: error rate > 5% on payment-api" actor: "PagerDuty" - time: "14:35" event: "Incident declared, team notified" actor: "On-call engineer" - time: "14:42" event: "Cause identified: connection pool exhausted" actor: "Backend team" - time: "14:55" event: "Mitigation: deployment rollback" actor: "Backend team" - time: "15:17" event: "Service restored, monitoring stable" actor: "Backend team" # Measurable impact impact: users_affected: 12500 transactions_failed: 847 revenue_impact: "~$16,500" slo_budget_consumed: "2.3 days" # Root cause analysis (5 Whys) root_cause_analysis: - question: "Why was the service unavailable?" answer: "DB connections were exhausted" - question: "Why were connections exhausted?" answer: "A slow query was blocking connections" - question: "Why was there a slow query?" answer: "Missing index on a new table" - question: "Why was the index missing?" answer: "Incomplete migration deployed" - question: "Why was the migration incomplete?" answer: "No execution plan validation in staging" # Corrective actions action_items: - id: "AI-001" type: "prevent" description: "Add SQL execution plan validation in CI" owner: "DBA team" due_date: "2026-01-22" priority: P1 - id: "AI-002" type: "detect" description: "Alert on connection pool usage > 80%" owner: "SRE team" due_date: "2026-01-18" priority: P1 - id: "AI-003" type: "mitigate" description: "Implement circuit breaker on DB queries" owner: "Backend team" due_date: "2026-01-29" priority: P2 # Lessons learned lessons_learned: what_went_well: - "Fast detection thanks to alerting (< 3 min)" - "Clear communication in incident channel" - "Rollback completed in less than 15 minutes" what_went_poorly: - "No load testing on new endpoint" - "Staging didn't reflect prod data volume" lucky: - "Incident during daytime with full team available" ``` O objetivo é aprimorar o sistema, não encontrar um culpado. As ações são classificadas em três categorias: prevenção, detecção e mitigação. ## Conclusão As entrevistas de DevOps cobrem um amplo espectro de habilidades, da cultura às ferramentas técnicas. O caminho para o sucesso está em demonstrar compreensão profunda dos conceitos, ilustrada por exemplos concretos de implementação. ### Checklist de preparação - ✅ Dominar os conceitos de CI/CD e ser capaz de projetar um pipeline completo - ✅ Compreender a arquitetura do Kubernetes e saber depurar problemas comuns - ✅ Conhecer as ferramentas de IaC (Terraform, Ansible) e seus casos de uso específicos - ✅ Saber configurar monitoramento e definir alertas relevantes - ✅ Aplicar boas práticas de segurança (menor privilégio, defesa em profundidade) - ✅ Explicar práticas de SRE (SLOs, error budgets, post-mortems) - ✅ Ter exemplos concretos de resolução de problemas - ✅ Ser capaz de explicar conceitos complexos de forma simples --- Source: SharpSkill (https://sharpskill.dev), tech interview preparation for your real stack. HTML version of this page: https://sharpskill.dev/pt/blog/devops/essential-devops-interview-questions